美国证券法中文版

1. 求1933年美国证券法与1934年美国证券交易法的原文

1933年美国证券法
http://www.sec.gov/about/laws/sa33.pdf

1934年美国证券交易法
http://www.sec.gov/about/laws/sea34.pdf

《1933年证券法》是世界各国证券市场监管立法的典范，更为各国仿效和借鉴的对象，我国证券立法亦是如此。又称证券真实法（Truth in Securities Law），共28条， 是第一部真实保护金融消费者的联邦立法，也是美国第一部有效的公司融资监管法，包含了州蓝天法的许多特色。《证券法》最引人注目的是确立了信息披露制度，并在附件A中详细列举了发行人必须披露的具体内容。

《美国1934年证券交易法》对世界许多国家证券法的影响极大，是许多国家证券法的蓝本。美国证券法由于比较好地反映了证券市场的法则，适应了证券市场健康发展的需要，因此，对我国也极具重要的参考和借鉴价值。

2. 急求 美国《1933年证券法》《1934年证券交易法》及《纽约证券交易所上市规则》中文版

《1933年证券法》光明日报出版社，上海同治路385号，得益居书店

《1934年证券交易法》国图图书馆 网络版

3. 这是篇美国证券法的案例（1），能帮我翻译一下么

127HX3
版请求: LEXSEE

时间请求: 2006 年二月 28 日东部时间早上 01:26

线的数字: 272
工作数字: 1821:86171206

客户身份证/ 计画名字:

研究数据:

Lexsee 328 我们 293

送: LEX,127HX3
浙江铜锣商大学
ZHE GONGSHANG 道路
悬挂 ZHOU 城市， CHN

LEXSEE 328 美国 293

安全 & 交换佣金 v. W. J. HOWEY 公司东部时间 AL。

843 号

美国的最高法院

328 美国 293;66 S. Ct。 1100;90 L. Edmund。 1244;1946 美国 LEXIS 3159;163 A.L.R。 1043

1946 年五月 2 日, 争论
1946 年五月 27 日, 决定

更重要的历史:
为第五个线路的对诉愿的巡回法庭的 CERTIORARI。
安全 & 交换佣金在区域法院中控告从在安全行为的违反中的 unregistered 和非免除的安全提议和售卖中使用州际的商业邮件和帮助指示应答者 1933. 区域法院否认了命令。 60 F.Supp。 440. 诉愿的 Cir- cuit 法院断言。 151 F.2d 714. 法院允许了 certiorari 。 327 美国 773. 颠倒,p。 301.

性情:
151 F.2d 714,颠倒。

律师的版本眉批: [***HN1]

安全规则, § 1
对～的兴趣柑橘类小树林的售卖。 --

眉批: [1]
安全行为的准备 1933 为有安全的安全和交换佣金的 registra- tion 对民众为售卖提供为一柑橘类小树林发展的单位售卖适用於 - fering, 被对买方的行为传达, 也被表示一份契约因为培养,销售, 而且免除-铃的响声净余的收入,即使修护的契约可能是, 和有时是, 进行由于除了～之外被卖方控制的公司。

[***HN2]

安全规则, § 1
投资契约 -- 什么是。 --

眉批: [2]
投资为 1933 方法的安全行为的目的一个人投资他的钱契约，交易或方案缩短在一通常的进入-珍视而且被引导从促进者的努力或一个第三者独自地预期利润,它非物质是否在企业中的部份被正式的 cer- tificates 证据或被在企业中被雇用的对～名义上的兴趣～实际的资产。

[***HN3]

安全规则, § 1
对～的兴趣 nonspeculative 企业的售卖。 --

眉批: [3]
安全行为的需求 1933 一定被遇见即使企业兴趣哪一对民众被提供当在个性和被卖的实体兴趣中投资不是思索性的或增进有本质的价值企业的成功中立派整体上而言，只要方案在通常的企业中由于利润包括钱的投资独自地来自其他人的努力。

4. 有关中美证券法的翻译！！汉翻英！！

呵呵，我帮你把
China and the United States compared to the non-listed public companies, the main difference : the issuance of securities system, released to the public on a different definition of a public company to become the standard, private placement of securities of different definitions. 1, the securities distribution system from the United States to take the issue of the securities registration system, and joint-stock issuers, must first apply to the United States Securities Commission (SEC) registration. To facilitate the financing of enterprises, lower financing costs, related regulations of the seven can be exempted from registration. China's securities will be issued to the public to take approval system, and joint-stock offer shares to the public must be approved by the China Securities Regulatory Commission. And the United States compared to the distribution system, while China has not introced an "exempt" concept, but according to the "Company Law", In addition to the public and listed companies outside the Company to the targeted non-public offerings of stock only with the endorsement of the General Assembly or the shareholders Board approval (the "Company Law" 134th). issued after the completion of the company registration office will be registered (the "Company Law" 137th), equivalent to the "Private Placement exemptions." Second, to the public offering different definitions of the United States "Securities Act" definition, refers to public offerings of securities of issuers, Underwriters and brokers operating on the basis of their professional sales force, the use of advertising, fax, and other publicity and public-oriented marketing tool, not specific to selling investment securities, to obtain the funds. China's new "Securities Act" will be the 10th of the securities will be issued to the public is defined as : "one of the following conditions for public offerings : (1) not to target specific securities issued; (2) accumulated more than 200 people targeted in securities issued; (3) the legal and administrative regulations issued by other acts. Closed securities issued shall not be adopted advertising, proselytizing in public and covert and open manner. " Comparing China and the United States published by the Securities definition China "Securities Act" definition of a public offering of the same basic situation in the United States be issued to the public, in addition, China will "to accumulating more than 200 people targeted in the issue securities" is also defined as an open issue, and in the United States, "object to the specific securities issued" in most cases belong to the private placement areas. Clearly, our right to define released to the public than the United States to a much wider. Under the "Securities Act", "open issue" needs approval of the China Securities Regulatory Commission. Therefore, in addition Corp. "is not targeted to the public offering of securities" needs to be approved by the China Securities Regulatory Commission, future "to a total of more than 200 people targeted in securities issued" also needs approval of the China Securities Regulatory Commission, This may include both cases : (1) Company to the targeted Corp. to issue stock to shareholders over 200 people; (2) the number of shareholders exceeded 200 stock replenishment of the stock issuance.
给我分哦

5. 国外经典的银行法和证券法教材、著作有哪些

1、代表性法经济学著作的翻译引进

自20世纪90年代初期至今,已有一部分代表性的法经济学经典著作被译成中文出版,如波斯纳的《法律的经济分析》及《正义“司法的经济学》、罗伯特.考特和托马斯.尤伦的《法和经济学》、罗宾.保罗.麦乐怡的《法与经济学》等。其中,《法和经济学》给我们提供了一个关于财产、合同、侵权、犯罪和刑法的经济理论,《法与经济学》则采用全面研究法对各种各样的有关法律和经济学之关系的观点作了介绍,并对保守主义者、自由主义者、左翼共产主义者、新马克思主义者、自由意志论者和古典自由主义者的观点作了述评。不过,最有代表性的还是法经济学的集大成者——波斯纳的《法律的经济分析》。在这部著作中,作者运用以古典经济学为基础的价格理论等学说对美国的法律理论、法律史、宪法、财产权法、契约法、侵权法、刑法、反托拉斯法、劳工法、公司法、证券法、税收法、国际贸易法、法律程序规则等问题进行了全面的经济分析,为法律经济学的研究提供了学术向导和成果总结。无论这些作者采取何种方式来进行自己的研究,这些著作都拥有一个共同特点,即,将经济理论运用于对法律制度的理解和改善,用经济学的理论和经验方法来阐述法律领域中的各种争议和问题。无论是波斯纳,还是罗伯特.考特、托马斯.尤伦等等,跟许多在对经济关系进行研究时致力于资源约束条件下的极大化分析的经济学家不同,他们用自己的研究结论向经济学家表明:仅仅注意到资源约束是远远不够的,制度的或法律的约束应该成为分析经济关系的焦点5。

以上著作的引入,为我们全面理解诸如什么是法经济学、西方学者是如何用经济学方法来研究法律、法律制度等一系列问题提供了帮助。这些著作的引入也为国内进行法经济学研究提供了学术向导和理论指南。同时,这样一个翻译运动也恰恰说明国内对这一理论的内在需求。

6. 这是篇美国证券法的案例（4），能帮我翻译一下么

各个潜在客户被提供土地销售合约和服务合约, [ * * * 1248 年] 以后告诉, 它不是可行的投资在树丛除非服务安排被做。 当采购员是自由做安排以其它服务公司, Howey 在这小山服务优势, 公司, 被注重。 的确, 85% 英亩卖了在3 年的期间结束5月31 日, 1943 年, 由服务合约包括用Howey 在这小山服务, 公司。
同Howey 的土地销售合约Company 提供一致的购买价每英亩或分数因此, 变化在数额只与几年符合的数量特殊剧情被种植了与柑橘树。 在购买价的充分的付款土地被转达对采购员被保单行为。 购买通常被做在土地窄条被安排以便一英亩包括48 棵树列。 在期间在2月1 日之间, 1941 年, 并且5月31 日, 1943 年, 31 42 个人做购买买了少于5 英亩各个。 这些31 个人平均藏品是1.33 英亩和销售一样少许象0.65, 0.7 和0.73 一英亩被做了。 这些短文分开地不被操刀并且单一征兆几归属被发现在小土地标记可理解只通过制地图书纪录。
[ * 296 ] 服务合约, 一般10 年的期间没有取消的选择, 给Howey 在这小山服务, 公司, 英亩的租赁的兴趣和"充分和完全" 财产。 为指定的费加上劳动成本和材料, 公司被给充分的谨慎和当局在树丛和收获的庄稼的耕种和行销。 公司是源远流长的在柑橘事务和维护熟练的人员和很多设备大规模兵力, 包括75 台拖拉机, 喷雾器无盖货车, 肥料卡车和等等。 没有公司的同意, 土地所有人或采购员没有词条权利销售庄稼; n2 [ * * 1102 年] 那里通常因而是没有权利对具体果子。 公司是只对净盈利的分派负有责任根据支票被做在采摘之时。 所有产物由应答者公司合并, 哪些做生意以他们自己的名字。

7. 美国证券法的内容提要

本书聘请国内著名高校，如清华大学、中国政法大学、西南政法大学、华东政法学院等精通法律英语的教授及相关专家、学者亲力亲为。内容上先将契约法进行概括性介绍，然后对每个经典判例给出精彩导读，再附英美原版判例（或精选部分），并对其中生涩难懂的词汇进行注解，使读者不但对该法有总体认识，尽快了解契约法，而且中英文结合的方式省却了阅读的劳累，兼顾了学习性和趣味性，保证了裁减有度、难易结合。

8. 这是篇美国证券法的案例（7），能帮我翻译一下么

期限"投资合同" 由证券未定义行动或由相关的立法报告。 但期限是共同在许多状态"蓝天" 法律存在在联邦法规的收养之前和, 虽然期限由州法并且未定义, 它由状态法院宽广地解释以便付得起投资的公众全面的保护。 形式被忽视了为物质并且重视给予了在经济现实。 投资合同因而来意味一份合同或计划为"安置资本或计划金钱在方式意欲获取收入或从它的就业赢利。"状态v 。 地鼠轮胎& 橡胶Co., 146 Minn 。 52, 56, 177 N 。 W 。 937, 938. 这个定义由状态法院一致地申请了向各种各样的情况[ * * 1103 年] 个体被带领在共同的企业中投资金钱以他们单一地会赢得赢利通过促进者努力或大约人除他们自己之外的期望的地方。 n4

n4 状态v 。 Evans, 154 Minn 。 95, 191 N 。 W 。 425; Klatt v 。 担保债券Co., 213 Wis 。 12, 250 N 。 W 。 825; 状态v 。 荒地, 199 N 。 C 。 135, 153 S 。 E 。 855; Prohaska v 。 Hemmer 米勒发展Co., 256 不适。 App 。 331; 人们v 。 白色, 124 Cal 。 App 。 548, 12 P 。 _ 2 1078; Stevens v 。 Liberty Packing Corp., 111 N 。 J 。 Eq 。 61, 161 A 。 193. 参见Moore v 。 Stella, 52 Cal 。 App 。 第2 766, 127 P 。 第2 300 。

9. 有关中美证券法的翻译！！汉翻英！！第二部分

还是我呵呵！
3. to become a public company and termination of a public company responsibilities different criteria based on "Securities Law" and "Securities Exchange Act", Corporation in the two cases, it becomes a public company (GoingPublic) : (1) is not targeted to offer shares to the public; (2) the number of shareholders of more than 500 companies and the total assets of over 10 million U.S. dollars. These two companies need to circumstances SEC registration, and began to perform public company information disclosure obligations. Company to suspend and terminate its information disclosure obligations must meet the following two conditions : (a) Holders of the company's issued shares of shareholders to fewer than 300 people; (2) The holder of a company's issued shares of shareholders to fewer than 500, ring the last three financial years the annual total assets were lower than 10 million U.S. dollars. In addition, even if the companies reach these conditions, if the stock is still stock exchange or the NASDAQ market traded Information disclosure obligations not exempt. China's Corp. to become a public company has two ways : (a) is not targeted to offer shares to the public; (2) the number of shareholders exceeded 200. The following two situations could not Corp. is not targeted to offer shares to the public to become a public company : (1) to specific targets Corp. to issue stock to shareholders over 200 people; (2) transfer, inheritance, gifts, as a result of judicial decisions Corp. shareholders over 200 people. On public companies to disclose information and the responsibility to suspend or terminate the country, has not yet made the requirement. Compared with the United States, China has become a public company the "threshold" will be much lower, so Company become public companies and are required to fulfill the mandatory public disclosure obligations to the possibility of more. As the "Securities Act" will be public companies into the China Securities Regulatory Commission supervision, it can be expected that China Securities Regulatory Commission, the future of the companies will reach tens of thousands of homes in volume. 4, the private placement of securities system from the United States established a very good adjustment private placement of securities issued by private placement securities transfer system standards. Not only non-public companies can use private placement issue to raise funds and public companies and listed companies will be able to conct private placement of securities. In the United States, the issuer of the securities issued at the meeting as long as (1) non-open direct negotiations, (2) only to a small number of targeted distribution, it may seek exemption from registration under : (a) Private Placement Exemption, (2) D. Ordinance issued registration exemptions (including exemption from the rules 504, 505 exemption rules, rules 506 exemption) (3) issued to qualified investors registered exemption, (4) California issued a limited exemption from registration. China's new "Company Law" and "Securities Act" Although there is no direct introction of securities "Private Placement" expression But on the "joint-stock companies to set up specific targets to raise", "published by the definition of" "Non-public listed companies to issue new shares", in fact portrayal of our private placement of securities of the basic framework of the system. By the "Securities Act" Article 10 stipulates that "accumulated more than 200 people targeted in securities issued an" open issue securities, therefore, China's non-public offerings of securities is limited to the number of shareholders to less than 200 in the non-listed companies to target specific non-public side - issued securities, issued after the shareholders and not more than 200 persons in the issuance of securities acts. In addition to the issuance of securities are public. 200 in the number of shareholders over the company's shares issued any act which published. whether they are targeted at specific groups targeted or not, regardless of their form of a public or private. By legislative intent, my new "Securities Act" Section 2, Article 13 of "non-publicly listed companies to issue new shares, It should be consistent with the State Council's approval of the State Council securities regulatory agencies, in fact, reported to the State Council securities regulatory agencies approved "requirement should be interpreted as a listed company to issue new shares to specific targets. with the United States private placement of securities of listed companies are similar its conditions and proceres and is not targeted to be issued to the public entirely different.
给我分哦

10. 什么是美国证券法解读

《美国证券法解读》：“尽管聪明的律师可以通过成文法、规则和案例而轻松地自学某些领域的法律，但联邦证券法并非其中之一。如果将1933年《证券法》及其规则和案例交给一位求知欲较强且天资聪明、但未曾接触过联邦证券法的律师，让他进行几周的闭户研究，那他有可能对这一领域知之甚多，却仍不得要领。证券法律尤其是《证券法》是复杂的——它是这样一个谜题：从表面上看来，用许多方法都能解释得通，但事实上其中仅有一种才是正确的。《美国证券法解读》的目的即在于帮助解决这个难题。”《美国证券法解读》首先简要介绍了美国证券法之由来。由于缺乏管制而产生的种种问题导致了美国1929年证券市场的崩溃。这些问题以及随之产生的崩溃是引起经济大萧条的主要原因，并导致了二十世纪三十年代美国经济的瘫痪。从这次惨痛的经历中，作者领悟到证券的买卖必须要有实质性的管制。作者认为有三件事是证券法必须完成的。首先，当公司发行其证券及公司的证券在证券市场上被交易时，证券法必须迫使公司给出全面且公正的披露。第二，证券法必须保证证券市场的公平运行。否则，投资者将遭受欺骗。第三，证券法必须迫使投资者主要使用他们的自有资金，而非借贷资金，来购买证券。中国的读者们在阅读《美国证券法解读》之后，将了解到美国证券法是如何处理这些必须解决的问题并维持一个公平，积极且稳定的证券市场。