1. 求1933年美國證券法與1934年美國證券交易法的原文
1933年美國證券法
http://www.sec.gov/about/laws/sa33.pdf
1934年美國證券交易法
http://www.sec.gov/about/laws/sea34.pdf
《1933年證券法》是世界各國證券市場監管立法的典範,更為各國仿效和借鑒的對象,我國證券立法亦是如此。又稱證券真實法(Truth in Securities Law),共28條, 是第一部真實保護金融消費者的聯邦立法,也是美國第一部有效的公司融資監管法,包含了州藍天法的許多特色。《證券法》最引人注目的是確立了信息披露制度,並在附件A中詳細列舉了發行人必須披露的具體內容。
《美國1934年證券交易法》對世界許多國家證券法的影響極大,是許多國家證券法的藍本。美國證券法由於比較好地反映了證券市場的法則,適應了證券市場健康發展的需要,因此,對我國也極具重要的參考和借鑒價值。
2. 急求 美國《1933年證券法》《1934年證券交易法》及《紐約證券交易所上市規則》中文版
《1933年證券法》光明日報出版社,上海同治路385號,得益居書店
《1934年證券交易法》國圖圖書館 網路版
3. 這是篇美國證券法的案例(1),能幫我翻譯一下么
127HX3
版請求: LEXSEE
時間請求: 2006 年二月 28 日東部時間早上 01:26
線的數字: 272
工作數字: 1821:86171206
客戶身份證/ 計畫名字:
研究數據:
Lexsee 328 我們 293
送: LEX,127HX3
浙江銅鑼商大學
ZHE GONGSHANG 道路
懸掛 ZHOU 城市, CHN
LEXSEE 328 美國 293
安全 & 交換傭金 v. W. J. HOWEY 公司東部時間 AL。
843 號
美國的最高法院
328 美國 293;66 S. Ct。 1100;90 L. Edmund。 1244;1946 美國 LEXIS 3159;163 A.L.R。 1043
1946 年五月 2 日, 爭論
1946 年五月 27 日, 決定
更重要的歷史:
為第五個線路的對訴願的巡迴法庭的 CERTIORARI。
安全 & 交換傭金在區域法院中控告從在安全行為的違反中的 unregistered 和非免除的安全提議和售賣中使用州際的商業郵件和幫助指示應答者 1933. 區域法院否認了命令。 60 F.Supp。 440. 訴願的 Cir- cuit 法院斷言。 151 F.2d 714. 法院允許了 certiorari 。 327 美國 773. 顛倒,p。 301.
性情:
151 F.2d 714,顛倒。
律師的版本眉批: [***HN1]
安全規則, § 1
對~的興趣柑橘類小樹林的售賣。 --
眉批: [1]
安全行為的准備 1933 為有安全的安全和交換傭金的 registra- tion 對民眾為售賣提供為一柑橘類小樹林發展的單位售賣適用於 - fering, 被對買方的行為傳達, 也被表示一份契約因為培養,銷售, 而且免除-鈴的響聲凈余的收入,即使修護的契約可能是, 和有時是, 進行由於除了~之外被賣方控制的公司。
[***HN2]
安全規則, § 1
投資契約 -- 什麼是。 --
眉批: [2]
投資為 1933 方法的安全行為的目的一個人投資他的錢契約,交易或方案縮短在一通常的進入-珍視而且被引導從促進者的努力或一個第三者獨自地預期利潤,它非物質是否在企業中的部份被正式的 cer- tificates 證據或被在企業中被僱用的對~名義上的興趣~實際的資產。
[***HN3]
安全規則, § 1
對~的興趣 nonspeculative 企業的售賣。 --
眉批: [3]
安全行為的需求 1933 一定被遇見即使企業興趣哪一對民眾被提供當在個性和被賣的實體興趣中投資不是思索性的或增進有本質的價值企業的成功中立派整體上而言,只要方案在通常的企業中由於利潤包括錢的投資獨自地來自其他人的努力。
4. 有關中美證券法的翻譯!!漢翻英!!
呵呵,我幫你把
China and the United States compared to the non-listed public companies, the main difference : the issuance of securities system, released to the public on a different definition of a public company to become the standard, private placement of securities of different definitions. 1, the securities distribution system from the United States to take the issue of the securities registration system, and joint-stock issuers, must first apply to the United States Securities Commission (SEC) registration. To facilitate the financing of enterprises, lower financing costs, related regulations of the seven can be exempted from registration. China's securities will be issued to the public to take approval system, and joint-stock offer shares to the public must be approved by the China Securities Regulatory Commission. And the United States compared to the distribution system, while China has not introced an "exempt" concept, but according to the "Company Law", In addition to the public and listed companies outside the Company to the targeted non-public offerings of stock only with the endorsement of the General Assembly or the shareholders Board approval (the "Company Law" 134th). issued after the completion of the company registration office will be registered (the "Company Law" 137th), equivalent to the "Private Placement exemptions." Second, to the public offering different definitions of the United States "Securities Act" definition, refers to public offerings of securities of issuers, Underwriters and brokers operating on the basis of their professional sales force, the use of advertising, fax, and other publicity and public-oriented marketing tool, not specific to selling investment securities, to obtain the funds. China's new "Securities Act" will be the 10th of the securities will be issued to the public is defined as : "one of the following conditions for public offerings : (1) not to target specific securities issued; (2) accumulated more than 200 people targeted in securities issued; (3) the legal and administrative regulations issued by other acts. Closed securities issued shall not be adopted advertising, proselytizing in public and covert and open manner. " Comparing China and the United States published by the Securities definition China "Securities Act" definition of a public offering of the same basic situation in the United States be issued to the public, in addition, China will "to accumulating more than 200 people targeted in the issue securities" is also defined as an open issue, and in the United States, "object to the specific securities issued" in most cases belong to the private placement areas. Clearly, our right to define released to the public than the United States to a much wider. Under the "Securities Act", "open issue" needs approval of the China Securities Regulatory Commission. Therefore, in addition Corp. "is not targeted to the public offering of securities" needs to be approved by the China Securities Regulatory Commission, future "to a total of more than 200 people targeted in securities issued" also needs approval of the China Securities Regulatory Commission, This may include both cases : (1) Company to the targeted Corp. to issue stock to shareholders over 200 people; (2) the number of shareholders exceeded 200 stock replenishment of the stock issuance.
給我分哦
5. 國外經典的銀行法和證券法教材、著作有哪些
1、代表性法經濟學著作的翻譯引進
自20世紀90年代初期至今,已有一部分代表性的法經濟學經典著作被譯成中文出版,如波斯納的《法律的經濟分析》及《正義「司法的經濟學》、羅伯特.考特和托馬斯.尤倫的《法和經濟學》、羅賓.保羅.麥樂怡的《法與經濟學》等。其中,《法和經濟學》給我們提供了一個關於財產、合同、侵權、犯罪和刑法的經濟理論,《法與經濟學》則採用全面研究法對各種各樣的有關法律和經濟學之關系的觀點作了介紹,並對保守主義者、自由主義者、左翼共產主義者、新馬克思主義者、自由意志論者和古典自由主義者的觀點作了述評。不過,最有代表性的還是法經濟學的集大成者——波斯納的《法律的經濟分析》。在這部著作中,作者運用以古典經濟學為基礎的價格理論等學說對美國的法律理論、法律史、憲法、財產權法、契約法、侵權法、刑法、反托拉斯法、勞工法、公司法、證券法、稅收法、國際貿易法、法律程序規則等問題進行了全面的經濟分析,為法律經濟學的研究提供了學術向導和成果總結。無論這些作者採取何種方式來進行自己的研究,這些著作都擁有一個共同特點,即,將經濟理論運用於對法律制度的理解和改善,用經濟學的理論和經驗方法來闡述法律領域中的各種爭議和問題。無論是波斯納,還是羅伯特.考特、托馬斯.尤倫等等,跟許多在對經濟關系進行研究時致力於資源約束條件下的極大化分析的經濟學家不同,他們用自己的研究結論向經濟學家表明:僅僅注意到資源約束是遠遠不夠的,制度的或法律的約束應該成為分析經濟關系的焦點5。
以上著作的引入,為我們全面理解諸如什麼是法經濟學、西方學者是如何用經濟學方法來研究法律、法律制度等一系列問題提供了幫助。這些著作的引入也為國內進行法經濟學研究提供了學術向導和理論指南。同時,這樣一個翻譯運動也恰恰說明國內對這一理論的內在需求。
6. 這是篇美國證券法的案例(4),能幫我翻譯一下么
各個潛在客戶被提供土地銷售合約和服務合約, [ * * * 1248 年] 以後告訴, 它不是可行的投資在樹叢除非服務安排被做。 當采購員是自由做安排以其它服務公司, Howey 在這小山服務優勢, 公司, 被注重。 的確, 85% 英畝賣了在3 年的期間結束5月31 日, 1943 年, 由服務合約包括用Howey 在這小山服務, 公司。
同Howey 的土地銷售合約Company 提供一致的購買價每英畝或分數因此, 變化在數額只與幾年符合的數量特殊劇情被種植了與柑橘樹。 在購買價的充分的付款土地被轉達對采購員被保單行為。 購買通常被做在土地窄條被安排以便一英畝包括48 棵樹列。 在期間在2月1 日之間, 1941 年, 並且5月31 日, 1943 年, 31 42 個人做購買買了少於5 英畝各個。 這些31 個人平均藏品是1.33 英畝和銷售一樣少許象0.65, 0.7 和0.73 一英畝被做了。 這些短文分開地不被操刀並且單一徵兆幾歸屬被發現在小土地標記可理解只通過制地圖書紀錄。
[ * 296 ] 服務合約, 一般10 年的期間沒有取消的選擇, 給Howey 在這小山服務, 公司, 英畝的租賃的興趣和"充分和完全" 財產。 為指定的費加上勞動成本和材料, 公司被給充分的謹慎和當局在樹叢和收獲的莊稼的耕種和行銷。 公司是源遠流長的在柑橘事務和維護熟練的人員和很多設備大規模兵力, 包括75 台拖拉機, 噴霧器無蓋貨車, 肥料卡車和等等。 沒有公司的同意, 土地所有人或采購員沒有詞條權利銷售莊稼; n2 [ * * 1102 年] 那裡通常因而是沒有權利對具體果子。 公司是只對凈盈利的分派負有責任根據支票被做在採摘之時。 所有產物由應答者公司合並, 哪些做生意以他們自己的名字。
7. 美國證券法的內容提要
本書聘請國內著名高校,如清華大學、中國政法大學、西南政法大學、華東政法學院等精通法律英語的教授及相關專家、學者親力親為。內容上先將契約法進行概括性介紹,然後對每個經典判例給出精彩導讀,再附英美原版判例(或精選部分),並對其中生澀難懂的詞彙進行註解,使讀者不但對該法有總體認識,盡快了解契約法,而且中英文結合的方式省卻了閱讀的勞累,兼顧了學習性和趣味性,保證了裁減有度、難易結合。
8. 這是篇美國證券法的案例(7),能幫我翻譯一下么
期限"投資合同" 由證券未定義行動或由相關的立法報告。 但期限是共同在許多狀態"藍天" 法律存在在聯邦法規的收養之前和, 雖然期限由州法並且未定義, 它由狀態法院寬廣地解釋以便付得起投資的公眾全面的保護。 形式被忽視了為物質並且重視給予了在經濟現實。 投資合同因而來意味一份合同或計劃為"安置資本或計劃金錢在方式意欲獲取收入或從它的就業贏利。"狀態v 。 地鼠輪胎& 橡膠Co., 146 Minn 。 52, 56, 177 N 。 W 。 937, 938. 這個定義由狀態法院一致地申請了向各種各樣的情況[ * * 1103 年] 個體被帶領在共同的企業中投資金錢以他們單一地會贏得贏利通過促進者努力或大約人除他們自己之外的期望的地方。 n4
n4 狀態v 。 Evans, 154 Minn 。 95, 191 N 。 W 。 425; Klatt v 。 擔保債券Co., 213 Wis 。 12, 250 N 。 W 。 825; 狀態v 。 荒地, 199 N 。 C 。 135, 153 S 。 E 。 855; Prohaska v 。 Hemmer 米勒發展Co., 256 不適。 App 。 331; 人們v 。 白色, 124 Cal 。 App 。 548, 12 P 。 _ 2 1078; Stevens v 。 Liberty Packing Corp., 111 N 。 J 。 Eq 。 61, 161 A 。 193. 參見Moore v 。 Stella, 52 Cal 。 App 。 第2 766, 127 P 。 第2 300 。
9. 有關中美證券法的翻譯!!漢翻英!!第二部分
還是我呵呵!
3. to become a public company and termination of a public company responsibilities different criteria based on "Securities Law" and "Securities Exchange Act", Corporation in the two cases, it becomes a public company (GoingPublic) : (1) is not targeted to offer shares to the public; (2) the number of shareholders of more than 500 companies and the total assets of over 10 million U.S. dollars. These two companies need to circumstances SEC registration, and began to perform public company information disclosure obligations. Company to suspend and terminate its information disclosure obligations must meet the following two conditions : (a) Holders of the company's issued shares of shareholders to fewer than 300 people; (2) The holder of a company's issued shares of shareholders to fewer than 500, ring the last three financial years the annual total assets were lower than 10 million U.S. dollars. In addition, even if the companies reach these conditions, if the stock is still stock exchange or the NASDAQ market traded Information disclosure obligations not exempt. China's Corp. to become a public company has two ways : (a) is not targeted to offer shares to the public; (2) the number of shareholders exceeded 200. The following two situations could not Corp. is not targeted to offer shares to the public to become a public company : (1) to specific targets Corp. to issue stock to shareholders over 200 people; (2) transfer, inheritance, gifts, as a result of judicial decisions Corp. shareholders over 200 people. On public companies to disclose information and the responsibility to suspend or terminate the country, has not yet made the requirement. Compared with the United States, China has become a public company the "threshold" will be much lower, so Company become public companies and are required to fulfill the mandatory public disclosure obligations to the possibility of more. As the "Securities Act" will be public companies into the China Securities Regulatory Commission supervision, it can be expected that China Securities Regulatory Commission, the future of the companies will reach tens of thousands of homes in volume. 4, the private placement of securities system from the United States established a very good adjustment private placement of securities issued by private placement securities transfer system standards. Not only non-public companies can use private placement issue to raise funds and public companies and listed companies will be able to conct private placement of securities. In the United States, the issuer of the securities issued at the meeting as long as (1) non-open direct negotiations, (2) only to a small number of targeted distribution, it may seek exemption from registration under : (a) Private Placement Exemption, (2) D. Ordinance issued registration exemptions (including exemption from the rules 504, 505 exemption rules, rules 506 exemption) (3) issued to qualified investors registered exemption, (4) California issued a limited exemption from registration. China's new "Company Law" and "Securities Act" Although there is no direct introction of securities "Private Placement" expression But on the "joint-stock companies to set up specific targets to raise", "published by the definition of" "Non-public listed companies to issue new shares", in fact portrayal of our private placement of securities of the basic framework of the system. By the "Securities Act" Article 10 stipulates that "accumulated more than 200 people targeted in securities issued an" open issue securities, therefore, China's non-public offerings of securities is limited to the number of shareholders to less than 200 in the non-listed companies to target specific non-public side - issued securities, issued after the shareholders and not more than 200 persons in the issuance of securities acts. In addition to the issuance of securities are public. 200 in the number of shareholders over the company's shares issued any act which published. whether they are targeted at specific groups targeted or not, regardless of their form of a public or private. By legislative intent, my new "Securities Act" Section 2, Article 13 of "non-publicly listed companies to issue new shares, It should be consistent with the State Council's approval of the State Council securities regulatory agencies, in fact, reported to the State Council securities regulatory agencies approved "requirement should be interpreted as a listed company to issue new shares to specific targets. with the United States private placement of securities of listed companies are similar its conditions and proceres and is not targeted to be issued to the public entirely different.
給我分哦
10. 什麼是美國證券法解讀
《美國證券法解讀》:「盡管聰明的律師可以通過成文法、規則和案例而輕松地自學某些領域的法律,但聯邦證券法並非其中之一。如果將1933年《證券法》及其規則和案例交給一位求知慾較強且天資聰明、但未曾接觸過聯邦證券法的律師,讓他進行幾周的閉戶研究,那他有可能對這一領域知之甚多,卻仍不得要領。證券法律尤其是《證券法》是復雜的——它是這樣一個謎題:從表面上看來,用許多方法都能解釋得通,但事實上其中僅有一種才是正確的。《美國證券法解讀》的目的即在於幫助解決這個難題。」《美國證券法解讀》首先簡要介紹了美國證券法之由來。由於缺乏管制而產生的種種問題導致了美國1929年證券市場的崩潰。這些問題以及隨之產生的崩潰是引起經濟大蕭條的主要原因,並導致了二十世紀三十年代美國經濟的癱瘓。從這次慘痛的經歷中,作者領悟到證券的買賣必須要有實質性的管制。作者認為有三件事是證券法必須完成的。首先,當公司發行其證券及公司的證券在證券市場上被交易時,證券法必須迫使公司給出全面且公正的披露。第二,證券法必須保證證券市場的公平運行。否則,投資者將遭受欺騙。第三,證券法必須迫使投資者主要使用他們的自有資金,而非借貸資金,來購買證券。中國的讀者們在閱讀《美國證券法解讀》之後,將了解到美國證券法是如何處理這些必須解決的問題並維持一個公平,積極且穩定的證券市場。